Re: [Maypole] The Future of Maypole

From: Aaron Trevena (teejay at droogs.org)
Date: Fri Nov 05 2004 - 09:47:07 GMT


On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Sebastian Riedel wrote:
> Doesn't solving a real problem make features look cool in the first
> place? And is there something like over-abstraction?

In answer to the first - depends on the person and their background.
In answer to the second - yes, look at many Java or .Net applications and
you will see a great deal of it. I have recently worked on a monster
project in Perl that was over abstracted and over-engineered.

> I see bad code allday, but it's always about not enough abstraction and
> spaghetti code, do you really know of an actual example for
> over-abstraction?

You can always abstract and refactor bad code, it can be harder to
simplify over-engineered code, especially once its in production.

I would always lean towards simplicity over abstraction, using the latter
only when needed rather than as a rule.

A.

-- 
Aaron J Trevena - Perl Hacker, Kung Fu Geek, Internet Consultant
AutoDia --- Automatic UML and HTML Specifications from Perl, C++ 
and Any Datasource with a Handler.     http://droogs.org/autodia

_______________________________________________ maypole mailing list maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:56 GMT