Re: [Maypole] The Future of Maypole

From: Sebastian Riedel (sri at oook.de)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 18:57:04 GMT


chromatic:
> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 08:56, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > I can't imagine what could sound more head-in-the-sand than an
> > unwillingness to look at how other people have solved common problems.
>
> I took it more as a warning that adding features that other frameworks
> have because they look cool and not because they solve any real problems
> that you have tends to lead to over-abstracted code.

Doesn't solving a real problem make features look cool in the first
place?
And is there something like over-abstraction?

I see bad code allday, but it's always about not enough abstraction and
spaghetti code, do you really know of an actual example for
over-abstraction?

sebastian

_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:56 GMT