Re: [Maypole] The Future of Maypole

From: Perrin Harkins (perrin at elem.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 19:09:24 GMT


On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:37, chromatic wrote:
> I took it more as a warning that adding features that other frameworks
> have because they look cool and not because they solve any real problems
> that you have tends to lead to over-abstracted code.

And yet it was a response to my post about the advantages of
tight-coupling and keeping things simple. I'm well aware of how feature
creep and too much abstraction can make a project hard to use, but I
don't think that pretending Maypole is the first or only Perl MVC
framework really benefits anyone.

- Perrin

_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:56 GMT