On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:54:25PM +0000, Dave Howorth wrote:
> I actually found some issues with CGI::Untaint today because it doesn't
> seem to provide any way for an untaint handler to pass specific
> validation failure information back to the application. It swallows it
> and passes back its own one-size-fits-all message.
Patches, or even suggestions, welcome.
Tony
_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT