Simon Flack:
> Now I've pretty much stated the obvious, I need to get something off my
> chest and eat some of my words. In a previous email, I said I'd like to
> see Maypole stabilise and have few (if any) backwardly incompatible
> changes. Now, in general I'm pretty happy with the model and the view,
> but I have a bit of problem with the controller. I think there have
> been both positive and negitive developments in that area. ...
> I believe this separation will make Maypole easier to understand and use.
> It should also make it a lot easier to unit test.
Great idea! But can we get it working, stable and backwards compatible
*first*?! Resist the urge to hack - there's always plenty of time for that
later.
Simon
-- You are in a maze of UUCP connections, all alike._______________________________________________ maypole mailing list maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT