Re: [Maypole] A few post-2.05 change questions

From: Peter Speltz (peterspeltz at yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jan 23 2005 - 03:42:00 GMT


--- Jesse Sheidlower <jester at panix.com> wrote:

>
> Hi. I'm just returning to some programming after time
> spent on $WORK, updated Maypole from 2.04 to 2.06, and
> promptly ran into two problems.
>
> First, in one of my databases, I have a column called
> "description", which is not an SQL reserved word or a
> reserved word in CDBI or anything.

they pulled/will pull that in 2.07.

> Second, in a different application--one that, unlike most of
> my Maypole apps, is straightforward and doesn't override half
> of Maypole--I am now getting untaint errors where I didn't
> used to before. I don't want to untaint anything here, and I
> don't have required columns, but in this situation when I
> leave a field blank, I am getting "author () does not untaint
> with default pattern" errors. Now, author is a display_column
> but I don't require it for untainting anywhere.

I have this one too. I thought i got it after upgrading CGI::Untaint though.
did CGI::Untaint get updated as well?

=====
pjs

                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
 

_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT