Simon Cozens wrote:
> I think, from the Maypole point of view, the cases for using ->table
> and the cases for using ->moniker have both been made, and it's up to
> Simon F as far as that's concerned.
FWIW, I agree. But I what I haven't seen agreed yet is that Maypole uses
moniker for two completely separate purposes: (1) to generate
identifiers for use in code and (2) to generate human-readable strings
in HTML pages. The two need to be separated. The U::m docs claim the
second use but the reality is the first use. IMHO, we should remove
classmetadata.moniker and replace it with a proper human-readable string.
Cheers, Dave
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 28/12/04_______________________________________________ maypole mailing list maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT