Tony Bowden wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 04:10:00AM +0000, Simon Flack wrote:
>
>
>>I agree. The most significant place that the table name is used over the
>>moniker() is the request url. That's a pretty significant change though.
>>
>>
>Hmm. Why's that? Do you mean for reasons of backwards compatbility, or
>in terms of technical implementation?
>
>I think it's quite an important change, and hadn't actually realised
>Maypole dispatched purely based on table names.
>
>
Even tho this will affect backwards-compability, I think it's a very
much needed change, especially to be able to support other models than
Class::DBI. I fully support using moniker to represent the model in urls
rather than table name.
Marcus
_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT