Re: [Maypole] Has anyone ever had a table name that could NOT double as a directory name?

From: Tony Bowden (tony-maypole at kasei.com)
Date: Wed Dec 29 2004 - 04:04:47 GMT

Next message: Simon Flack: "Re: [Maypole] Why is moniker used instead of of table name when looking for table specific templates?"
Previous message: Tony Bowden: "Re: [Maypole] Why is moniker used instead of of table name when looking for table specific templates?"
In reply to: Peter Speltz: "[Maypole] Has anyone ever had a table name that could NOT double as a directory name?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:55:17PM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
> Has anyone ever had a table name that could *NOT* double as a directory name if
> need be? (A real table not a theoretical one.)

Personally, probably not.

But I have seen some farily horrendous MS SQL Server set-ups with table
names from hell, including, IIRC, ones which have colons and slashes,
making them rather nasty on either a windows or unix platform...

Tony

_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole

Next message: Simon Flack: "Re: [Maypole] Why is moniker used instead of of table name when looking for table specific templates?"
Previous message: Tony Bowden: "Re: [Maypole] Why is moniker used instead of of table name when looking for table specific templates?"
In reply to: Peter Speltz: "[Maypole] Has anyone ever had a table name that could NOT double as a directory name?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT