Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?

From: Marcus Ramberg (marcus at thefeed.no)
Date: Tue Dec 07 2004 - 23:57:38 GMT

Next message: Marcus Ramberg: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Previous message: Simon Flack: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
In reply to: Simon Flack: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Next in thread: David Baird: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Reply: David Baird: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On 7. des. 2004, at 19.27, Simon Flack wrote:

> On the face of it this looks ok, but I really need to have a closer
> look at meta_info(), and a quick test before commiting that.
>
> While we're at it, should related() return info about has_a
> relationships?

I share the sentiments. related is not for has_a relationships.

Marcus

Next message: Marcus Ramberg: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Previous message: Simon Flack: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
In reply to: Simon Flack: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Next in thread: David Baird: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Reply: David Baird: "Re: [Maypole-dev] Bug in Maypole::Model::CDBI ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT