On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 23:17:18 +0100, Marcus Ramberg wrote
> On 5. des. 2004, at 19.12, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>
> > Simon Flack <sf at flacks.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:56:27 +0100, Marcus Ramberg wrote
> >
> >> I don't think we need to duplicate the code in Maypole::Model::Base.
> >> How about something like this:
> >
> > FWIW, I think this approach is cleaner.
>
> I agree ;) I just hacked this together quickly, and didn't even test
> it before jumping into my car to drive home. Glad to see a working
> version. Lazyness has prevailed again. Simon, if you don't mind,
> I'll apply this.
Yep, go ahead.
> Unless ... Maybe a general populate_objects method
> or something would be better? That way you could override how
> initial population goes on a class-by-class basis?
I think that's what retrieve() is for.
--simonflk
_______________________________________________
maypole-dev mailing list
maypole-dev at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT