On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Nic Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 03:46:39PM +0000, Simon Cozens wrote:
>> But what I'm (not so) secretly hoping is that when Maypole gets cleaned up for
>> a new release and the core implementation is polished a little and people
>> WRITE LOTS OF APPLICATIONS IN IT BEFORE HACKING IT TO PIECES, we'll discover
>> that the separation of concerns you're talking about really isn't that
>> important, when it comes down to it.
> http://www.platinummetalsreview.com/
>
> There's lots of complexity but very little of the complexity is due
> to maypole - integrating swish-e and a content coming in as xml was
> much more fun.
Can you let us know (via the list or maybe a perl.com/tpj/etc article) how
you did things like integrating non-cdbi data and table-less views?
> I feel relatively experienced in using Maypole as a framework now.
Well done. There is a lot to it, TT and CDBI themselves are pretty large.
> I also feel fairly strongly that it is pretty good - it needs tweaking
> and polishing, not a revolution. I'm of the school that says make it
> more Template Toolkit based too but I think that, if Maypole is to
> succeed it needs usage not endless development.
Yes, I was talking to sri on irc about comparing and contrasting example
sites built with various frameworks and the experiences of developing
them. Not so much a bakeoff, more of get together.
A.
-- Aaron J Trevena - Perl Hacker, Kung Fu Geek, Internet Consultant AutoDia --- Automatic UML and HTML Specifications from Perl, C++ and Any Datasource with a Handler. http://droogs.org/autodia_______________________________________________ maypole mailing list maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:57 GMT