Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes

From: Dave Howorth (dhoworth at mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Oct 11 2004 - 14:25:12 BST

Next message: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Previous message: Dave Howorth: "Re: [Maypole] Maypole 2.0 factory templates"
In reply to: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Next in thread: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Reply: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Markus Spring wrote:
> So the mechanism is correct. Could it be that MySQL resp. DBD::mysql
> accepts an empty string for integer fields, too?

Almost certainly. It may well depend on table type as well. There are
some interesting test cases at:
1.1. NULL, or when NULL IS NOT NULL
http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html#1_1

Cheers, Dave

_______________________________________________
maypole mailing list
maypole at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole

Next message: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Previous message: Dave Howorth: "Re: [Maypole] Maypole 2.0 factory templates"
In reply to: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Next in thread: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Reply: Markus Spring: "Re: [Maypole] beerdb/postgres woes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:56 GMT