David R. Baird:
> A couple of recent patches are playing around with $r->{query} and
> $r->{params}. Would it not be more sensible for Maypole to combine
> both GET and POST parameters into a single set, and put them in
> $r->{params}, and forget about $r->{query} altogether?
I don't know. A lot of the decisions I've made maintaining Maypole have taken
into consideration whether or not this would screw over existing Maypole
users. A change like this would, so I wouldn't do it.
I suspect that I'd like to see behaviour-changing "fixes", like this one,
mentioned on maypole@ first to make sure users are aware that their
applications will break the next time they install Maypole. That sort of thing
tends to put users off a technology, if they're not expecting it.
Sebastian (the new Maypole maintainer) (hooray!) may view the world
differently, and I may after all be worrying about nothing, so I'll defer to
him from now on.
--
CLUELESSNESS:
There are No Stupid Questions,
But There Are a LOT of Inquisitive Idiots
http://www.despair.com
_______________________________________________
maypole-dev mailing list
maypole-dev at lists.netthink.co.uk
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/maypole-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 22:25:56 GMT